by Ben on Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:26 am
My copy of "The Trap Door Maker" arrived in the mail last week and I finished it in a couple of sittings.
I can now say that:
1. It does work reasonably well as a standalone story. Those who haven't read Leroux's original novel will find it to be coherent and intelligible, though much of the obvious foreshadowing will fly completely over their head and the ending will seem abrupt (it's really more of a cliffhanger for Bregman's upcoming comic book of "Phantom Of The Opera" than anything else)
2. This is not a revisionist depiction of the characters. Erik is the sarcastic, oddly childlike, stone-cold-killer that we all know and love from Leroux (though being younger, he's not as adept at killing initially, but he soon learns). The Daroga is shifty-but-honourable, just like in Leroux. I had no trouble reconciling Bregman's characterisations with the originals.
3. This is not just a regurgitation of the way Susan Kay depicted Erik's early years. Bregman has his own take on things.
My general impressions of this book:
It's quite short, and fans of this version who refer to it as a "graphic novel" are being misleading. I finished it in a couple of sittings and could easily have finished it in a single sitting if I wasn't so busy with work. My one real disappointment with "The Trap Door Maker" was that I think it could've been longer.
Bregman's book is an intelligent one, but not a thought-provoking one. He comes up with an interesting plot, his dialogue is literate and believable... but he doesn't even try to psychoanalyse any of these characters. If you come to this book wanting a deeper understanding of Erik's psychology then this book will disappoint. Though his past is vividly depicted, Erik remains an enigma in many respects
(and perhaps that is a good thing - there's another extreme in fan fiction to over explain things... I am looking at you, Madame Kay...)
This book is not in the least bit romantic. No nookie for Erik here, no sir.... and yet, neither does Erik come across as a terrifying and imposing figure. Bregman has done quite a remarkable thing here... his Erik is human without being cutesy and fluffy... his Erik is also dangerous without coming across as an outright villain... bravo for pulling off such a difficult balancing act, Bregman. It's something that most authors of Phan-Phiction do not even dare to attempt.
I also liked how the design of child-Erik's mask was like the Lon Chaney version.
And I liked how we never got to see Erik's face, like in the Charles Dance philm.
The sample chapter from Bregman's upcoming "Phantom" adaptation and his initial draft sketches of Erik's face both promise great things to come.
Seriously, Anne, you should skip ahead in your timeline to read this book.
As much as going through everything chronologically must be more enlightening from an academic perspective, having to wade through crud like Becky Meadows in order to get to Bregman's book is just torturing yourself.
Bregman's balanced and unsentimental take on this character is a delicacy to be savoured amidst so much sugar coated crap that's out there.